![]() ![]() Louisiana has a goal of zero fatalities and improvements in its data systems are helping the State reach its goal. These groups can request access to the data repository or can receive a file with all available data. Louisiana also shares its data with local governments, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and the Louisiana State Police. HSRG has developed a website dedicated to data related to Louisiana's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), given the data-driven nature of the plan. LADOTD uses its data to identify needs for both spot improvements and systematic countermeasures through its Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). LADOTD uses data from LACRASH in all aspects of its safety program. Maintaining HSRG's server and network and.Developing and programming websites and applications.Working with law enforcement agencies to distribute and trouble-shoot GPS units and driver's license scanners.Improving crash geo-location and performing data validation.Developing business intelligence applications.Installing, providing support for, and training police officers to use LACRASH.Through a three-year renewable contract, full-time HSRG employees are responsible for: This partnership not only offers LADOTD a scalable and robust data program, but also provides the agency with access to cutting-edge technology, through HSRG's research and experiments. ![]() Responsible for much more than data entry, HSRG is led by a statistician with experience evaluating seatbelt laws, red light cameras, and other legislative issues. Today, LSU's Highway Research Safety Group has become an integral part of LADOTD with 14 full-time employees and 12-20 graduate research students. LACRASH helped transition the state from paper reporting to a primarily electronic reporting-by the end of 2012, more than 90% of all crash reports in the State were being filed electronically-saving the agency both time and money and essentially wiping out the problem of report backlogs. This transition was expected to result in a short-term backlog, but would offer the opportunity for New Mexico to revamp its data program.īoth Connecticut and New Mexico wanted to glean best practices from LADOTD's data partnership with LSU/HSRG, which evolved over a period of more than ten years and included the development of a proprietary electronic crash reporting system, called LACRASH, used across the state. NMDOT, on the other hand, had a minimal backlog but was preparing to transition responsibility for data collection from the New Mexico Corrections Department (NMCD) to the University of New Mexico (UNM). CTDOT's had a 14-month backlog for entering crash data and the agency was evaluating opportunities to share responsibility for data entry with the University of Connecticut (UCONN). By studying the best practices developed during LADOTD's 12-year partnership with LSU, CTDOT and NMDOT hope to avoid pitfalls and advance their university crash data partnerships quickly and effectively.Īt the time of the peer exchange, both Connecticut and New Mexico's data programs were in a state of transition. It requires dedicated leadership on both sides, a strategic and prioritized approach, and checks and balances to ensure data integrity and security. Some state DOTs have turned to universities to help manage crash data due to the university expertise, staffing flexibilities, and IT capabilities, but building a successful data partnership is not an easy task. States have a variety of models for managing these processes, so finding a successful model that best meets specific state needs can be challenging. This report summarizes the key lessons from this dynamic peer exchange and highlights the progress made by each agency in advancing their data partnerships.īecause there are no uniform guidelines that dictate how states collect crash data, collecting, storing, analyzing, and accessing accurate and uniform crash data has led to a variety of challenges for the agencies responsible for these tasks, in many cases, state DOTs. While CTDOT's and NMDOT's goals were slightly different, each wished to advance their electronic crash reporting efforts and develop more comprehensive and collaborative relationships with their respective state universities to collect, store, and analyze crash data. In March 2012, the Connecticut (CTDOT) and New Mexico (NMDOT) Departments of Transportation met in Baton Rouge, Louisiana for a two-day peer session dedicated to exploring the intricate 12-year safety data partnership between the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD) and Louisiana State University's (LSU) Highway Safety Research Group (HSRG) (see Appendix A for a complete list of participants). Developing Action Plans for Connecticut and Mexico Crash Data: The Key to Better Safety Programsĥ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |